Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
ivci:bordeaux_2025 [2025/05/29 20:23] – [Canadian Experience] nbunker | ivci:bordeaux_2025 [2025/05/30 08:47] (current) – fkaag | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Shaping the Future of Global Vaccine Interoperability === | === Shaping the Future of Global Vaccine Interoperability === | ||
- | The International | + | The first in-person meeting of the International Vaccine |
+ | |||
+ | The meeting opened with a review of IVC's goals and accomplishments so far, including monthly calls, the launch of the IVC website, interviews with countries and organizations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The core of the meeting focused on in-depth presentations about NUVA and its integration into systems like SNOMED CT, WHO Drug, national registries, and EU projects such as ePIL and the European Vaccination Card (EVC). Real-world use cases from Luxembourg, Canada, the U.S., and Qatar demonstrated the challenges of managing and reconciling | ||
+ | |||
+ | Toward the end of the meeting, discussions shifted to sustainability and future governance. Participants debated the pros and cons of forming a formal organization versus aligning with existing structures like SNOMED or HL7. While no final decision was made, there was strong consensus that IVC fills a unique gap and that its work should be nurtured through partnerships and “matchmaking” with larger efforts already underway. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The energy and feedback from participants confirmed that this work is both needed and technically on the right track. Moving forward, the IVC Initiative will focus on expanding its community, deepening partnerships, and continuing to serve as a bridge between technical solutions and public health realities in the field of immunization. | ||
- | This one-day summit was a unique opportunity to collaborate, | ||
====== Bordeaux 2025 Meeting Summary ====== | ====== Bordeaux 2025 Meeting Summary ====== | ||
- | **Date:** May 9, 2025 | + | **Date:** May 9, 2025 |
- | **Location: | + | **Location: |
- | **Event:** International Summit on Vaccine Coding & Standards | + | **Event:** International Summit on Vaccine Coding & Standards |
**Hosted by:** International Vaccine Codes Initiative (IVCI) | **Hosted by:** International Vaccine Codes Initiative (IVCI) | ||
Line 36: | Line 43: | ||
===== Session Summaries ===== | ===== Session Summaries ===== | ||
- | === Foundations & Global Perspectives === | + | FOUNDATIONS AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES |
==== NUVA: What It Is and Why It Matters ==== | ==== NUVA: What It Is and Why It Matters ==== | ||
Line 45: | Line 52: | ||
- | === Key Takeaways | + | === Key Points |
**Origins and Evolution** | **Origins and Evolution** | ||
Line 87: | Line 94: | ||
A demonstration of the NUVA mapping platform was shared: | A demonstration of the NUVA mapping platform was shared: | ||
- | [https:// | + | [[https:// |
=== Additional Notes === | === Additional Notes === | ||
Line 93: | Line 100: | ||
==== How NUVA Uses Valences to Standardize Vaccine Codes ==== | ==== How NUVA Uses Valences to Standardize Vaccine Codes ==== | ||
- | //Speaker: Jean-Louis Koeck// | + | //Speaker: Jean-Louis Koeck (Syadem)// |
This presentation provided critical clinical context for understanding the valence model at the heart of NUVA. | This presentation provided critical clinical context for understanding the valence model at the heart of NUVA. | ||
- | == Key Takeaways | + | === Key Points === |
* **Core Definitions**: | * **Core Definitions**: | ||
Line 110: | Line 117: | ||
- Vaccine prescription using valence labels rather than commercial product names | - Vaccine prescription using valence labels rather than commercial product names | ||
- | == In Summary == | + | === In Summary |
Valences offer a **common clinical language** to assess protection, regardless of which product or national code system is used. This session made clear that valences are the **core bridge** between vaccination data and actionable immunization guidance. | Valences offer a **common clinical language** to assess protection, regardless of which product or national code system is used. This session made clear that valences are the **core bridge** between vaccination data and actionable immunization guidance. | ||
==== The NUVA Extension to SNOMED CT ==== | ==== The NUVA Extension to SNOMED CT ==== | ||
- | *Speakers: Suzy Roy & Peter Williams (SNOMED International)* | + | //Speakers: Suzy Roy & Peter Williams (SNOMED International)// |
This presentation explained how NUVA is being integrated into the SNOMED CT ecosystem to support broader adoption and interoperability. | This presentation explained how NUVA is being integrated into the SNOMED CT ecosystem to support broader adoption and interoperability. | ||
Line 147: | Line 154: | ||
- | === Real-World Use Cases – Global & European Union === | + | REAL-WORD USE CASES - GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN UNION |
==== EU Strategy for Cross-Border Vaccination Records ==== | ==== EU Strategy for Cross-Border Vaccination Records ==== | ||
- | *Speaker: Georgios Margetidis* | + | //Speaker: Georgios Margetidis, Health and Digital European Agency (HaDEA)// |
- | *Notes | + | |
+ | === Key points === | ||
+ | Georgios presented the frame for the European Commission (EC) actions in the field of digital health. | ||
+ | |||
+ | According | ||
+ | |||
+ | The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation, published in March 2025, creates a new context for digital health, with the obligation for Member States to progressively build up interoperability across electronic health records both for primary and secondary use of data. | ||
+ | |||
+ | An harmonized approach for recording administered vaccines would be a significant contribution to this objective. Patient summaries, including vaccination history, should be exchangeable across all Member States by March 2029. | ||
+ | === In summary === | ||
+ | The EHDS regulation allows the EC to become prescriptive on interoperability. | ||
==== View from the Industry (ePIL & NUVA Integration) ==== | ==== View from the Industry (ePIL & NUVA Integration) ==== | ||
Line 209: | Line 226: | ||
- | === Real-World Use Cases – Countries === | + | REAL-WORK USE CASES - COUNTRIES |
==== Luxembourg Experience ==== | ==== Luxembourg Experience ==== | ||
- | //Speaker: Maud Delporte* (Agence eSanté Luxembourg)// | + | //Speaker: Maud Delporte (Agence eSanté Luxembourg)// |
Maud Delporte shared the ongoing efforts in Luxembourg to digitize and centralize vaccine histories through the **Carnet de Vaccination Électronique (CVE)**—a national immunization registry built with NUVA at its core. | Maud Delporte shared the ongoing efforts in Luxembourg to digitize and centralize vaccine histories through the **Carnet de Vaccination Électronique (CVE)**—a national immunization registry built with NUVA at its core. | ||
Line 349: | Line 366: | ||
- Actively developed in collaboration with provincial stakeholders. | - Actively developed in collaboration with provincial stakeholders. | ||
- | * **Successes and Challenges** | + | * **Successes: |
- | | + | |
- Rapid support and adoption for COVID-19 vaccine codes. | - Rapid support and adoption for COVID-19 vaccine codes. | ||
- National RFC (Request For Change) process in place. | - National RFC (Request For Change) process in place. | ||
- Strong alignment between NVC and CHI terminologies. | - Strong alignment between NVC and CHI terminologies. | ||
- | | + | * **Challenges: |
- **Outdated and local terminologies** persist in some jurisdictions. | - **Outdated and local terminologies** persist in some jurisdictions. | ||
- High barrier to **SNOMED adoption** for smaller organizations. | - High barrier to **SNOMED adoption** for smaller organizations. | ||
Line 369: | Line 385: | ||
- | + | IMPLEMENTING | |
- | === Implementing | + | |
==== Mapping Across Code Systems ==== | ==== Mapping Across Code Systems ==== | ||
- | *Speaker: Timothée Doulut* | + | //Speaker: Timothée Doulut |
- | *Notes to be added* | + | |
+ | Timothée Doulut demonstrated how the NUVA system supports cross-mapping between various vaccine coding systems, using valences as the unifying conceptual anchor. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Key Points === | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | Once valences are known, the NUVA system can identify the corresponding vaccine codes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | - NUVA vaccine codes | ||
+ | - Associated valences | ||
+ | - Brand or abstract vaccine concepts | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The system supports both: | ||
+ | - **Direct mapping** (e.g., a specific product like PRIORIX) | ||
+ | - **Indirect mapping** via shared valences (e.g., DTaP/Hib combinations) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Handling Missing or New Concepts**: If an external code has no match in NUVA: | ||
+ | - It is assessed by reviewing disease coverage, product name, dose, and formulation. | ||
+ | - If new valences are needed, they are created. | ||
+ | - If the vaccine is already covered by existing valences, a **new vaccine concept** is added using those valences. | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | - Determine if the code is **abstract or concrete**. | ||
+ | - Identify associated **diseases** and **valences**. | ||
+ | - Evaluate whether to **reuse** or **create** a concept. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The goal is always to preserve semantic precision while supporting practical interoperability. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Terminology Sensitivities: | ||
+ | - Intended meaning: a **generalized vaccine concept** not tied to a specific product. | ||
+ | - However, participants from the **vaccine manufacturing sector** noted that “generic” implies **non-branded biosimilar drugs**, which do not yet exist for vaccines. | ||
+ | - Outcome: The group agreed to **avoid using " | ||
+ | |||
+ | === In Summary === | ||
+ | This session highlighted how **NUVA’s valence-driven approach** supports efficient and scalable mapping across multiple vaccine coding systems. The demonstration of the mapping tool and discussion around concept management illustrated how NUVA is built to **bridge gaps** between fragmented code systems, while adapting respectfully to stakeholder language and expectations. | ||
==== Metrics on Code Systems ==== | ==== Metrics on Code Systems ==== | ||
- | *Speaker: François Kaag* | + | //Speaker: François Kaag (IVCI/ |
- | *Notes to be added* | + | |
+ | François Kaag introduced a method for using NUVA to generate metrics that evaluate the completeness, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Key Points === | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | - " | ||
+ | - " | ||
+ | - Branded vaccines like " | ||
+ | * He introduced the **" | ||
+ | * **Completeness and Precision Metrics**: NUVA can be used to compare how well other coding systems: | ||
+ | - **Completeness**: | ||
+ | - **Precision**: | ||
+ | * Example findings: | ||
+ | - **CVX** covers 88% of NUVA concepts with 82% precision. | ||
+ | - **ATC** covers 83%, but precision is only 71%. | ||
+ | - **CVC** is lower on both measures. | ||
+ | - **CNK** has very low completeness and high ambiguity (precision not calculated). | ||
+ | * **Redundancy** | ||
+ | Redundancy measures how many codes in an external system map to the same NUVA concept. This isn’t necessarily a flaw—it often reflects the external system' | ||
+ | * Example: | ||
+ | - CVX-120 and CVX-170 both map to the same NUVA concept (DTaP/ | ||
+ | - CNK codes include both flask and syringe presentations for the same vaccine. | ||
+ | * **Tooling and Results**: A Python script (`NUVA_Eval.py`) was introduced to calculate these metrics. | ||
+ | - Input: a CSV mapping file. | ||
+ | - Output: metrics for **completeness**, | ||
+ | - Reference materials and code are available at: https:// | ||
+ | * **Interpreting the Metrics**: These metrics are **not absolute quality scores**—they must be interpreted based on the **intended purpose** of the code system: | ||
+ | - A code system may be highly **complete** but imprecise (e.g., a generic “Any Vaccine” code). | ||
+ | - Conversely, pharmaceutical databases may be **highly precise** but unable to represent historical or abstract vaccination records. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === In Summary === | ||
+ | |||
+ | NUVA provides a structured way to **evaluate and compare vaccine coding systems**. By analyzing how abstract and concrete vaccine concepts are covered and differentiated, | ||
===== Next Steps and Closing Discussion ===== | ===== Next Steps and Closing Discussion ===== | ||
Line 397: | Line 482: | ||
**Closing Remarks:** | **Closing Remarks:** | ||
- | Despite a few early departures, the day ended with energy and optimism. Feedback was positive, and the technical direction of NUVA was affirmed. The key challenge ahead is ensuring long-term viability—through partnerships, | + | Despite a few early departures, the day ended with energy and optimism. Feedback was positive, and the technical direction of NUVA was affirmed. The key challenge ahead is ensuring long-term viability—through partnerships, |
===== Next Meeting Planning ===== | ===== Next Meeting Planning ===== | ||
Line 408: | Line 493: | ||
The consensus: IVC should position itself as a collaborative infrastructure partner—bridging multiple organizations working toward better vaccine interoperability. | The consensus: IVC should position itself as a collaborative infrastructure partner—bridging multiple organizations working toward better vaccine interoperability. | ||
- | ===== To Be Added ===== | ||
- | Each section above contains placeholders. Please return and fill in: | ||
- | * Technical and clinical details of each presentation. | ||
- | * Examples or screenshots shown (if any). | ||
- | * Audience questions and feedback from each session. | ||
- | * Any significant quotes or memorable moments from speakers. | ||
Line 420: | Line 499: | ||
- | ==== Slide decks ==== | + | ===== Slide decks ===== |
^ Slides | ^ Slides | ||
| **TRAINING SESSION** | | **TRAINING SESSION** |